Corticospinal tract hyperintensity in patients with LGI1-antibody encephalitis and other central nervous system disorders with neuroglial antibodies.

The frequency of corticospinal tract (CST) T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in disorders with neuroglial antibodies is unclear. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed brain MRIs of 101 LGI1-antibody encephalitis patients, and observed CST hyperintensity in 30/101 (30%). It was mostly bilateral (93%), not associated with upper motor neuron signs/symptoms (7%), and frequently decreased over time (39%). In a systematic review including patients with other neuroglial antibodies, CST hyperintensity was reported in 110 with neuromyelitis optica (94%), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease (2%), Ma2-antibody (3%) and GAD65-antibody paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (1%). CST hyperintensity is not an infrequent finding in LGI1-Ab encephalitis and other disorders with neuroglial antibodies.

An automated alert system based on the p-Tau/Tau ratio to quickly inform health professionals upon a suspected case of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

INTRODUCTION: Knowing the risk of potential sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) instrument-contamination is essential in hospitals. We examined the relevance of the p-Tau/Tau ratio to exclude a probable case of sCJD in clinical practice, and we established an alert system to quickly inform health professionals in case of positivity. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 143 cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients suspected for sCJD. The distinction between probable cases of sCJD and other patients was based on clinical, paraclinical and biological (14-3-3, Tau, p-Tau, Aß 1-42) data. From this experience, the health professionals developed an alert system to be implemented upon a suspected case of sCJD. RESULTS: A significant decrease in p-Tau/Tau ratio between sCJD and the other diseases was observed (p < 0 .001). The combined Tau test presented a sensitivity higher than 14-3-3 (100% versus 92.3%, p =0 .006) and an equivalent specificity (90% versus 96.1%). The time required for obtaining results was higher for 14-3-3 due to the centralization of investigations in some laboratories (3 weeks versus 2 h). In the presence of these elements, the triggering of the alert system was based on the p-Tau/Tau ratio. This system involves sending an automatic mail to the hospital department involved in the patient's care and the hospital hygiene team, which oversees the application of the procedures. CONCLUSION: The p-Tau/Tau concentrations present the desired criteria for use in current medical practice to fight against iatrogenic transmission. The alert system confirms a probable case of sCJD instantly to health professionals. Hygiene and sterilization measures can be applied immediately.

Differentiating PNES from epileptic seizures using conversational analysis on French patients: A prospective blinded study.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) resemble epileptic seizures (ES) but are not caused by the occurrence of excessive cortical neuronal discharge. Previous studies in German-, English-, and Italian-speaking patients showed that patients used a different communicative style to talk about their seizures. They demonstrated that the diagnosis between PNES and ES could be predicted using qualitative assessment and a diagnostic scoring aid (DSA). The objective of our study was to evaluate the contribution of linguistic analysis in the differential diagnosis between ES and PNES in a French patient population. During an extended video-electroencephalogram (video-EEG) monitoring, 13 patients presented PNES and 19 patients with ES. Two neurologists blindly and independently analyzed the interview of each patient. Rater 1 predicted the correct diagnosis in 27 of 32 patients (84%) and Rater 2 in 28 of 32 patients (88%). Interrater reliability of qualitative analysis was satisfactory (k = 0.68, interrater agreement = 84.4%). Using a simplified DSA, Rater 1 and Rater 2 would have correctly diagnosed 88% (28/32 patients) and 91 % (29/32) of the cases, respectively. Our blinded prospective study confirms the diagnostic value of conversational analysis, performed by neurologists, to differentiate PNES from ES in French-speaking patients.

Development of permanent brain damage after subacute encephalopathy with seizures in alcoholics.

PURPOSE: To describe additional cases of subacute encephalopathy with seizures in alcoholics (SESA) syndrome, and to question the clinical and radiological course. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics, electroencephalography (EEG), MRI studies at the admission and over the following 6 months of 5 cases of SESA syndrome visited our neurology department between 2010 and 2016. RESULTS: Five middle-aged males with history of chronic alcohol abuse were admitted for confusion, neurological deficit and seizures. Four patients had recurrent partial seizures requiring 2 or more antiepileptic drugs. EEG showed interictal periodic lateralized discharges in 4 patients and focal rhythmic delta activities in 1. Initial MRI studies revealed unilateral hemispheric cortical-subcortical areas of increased T2/ FLAIR signal and restricted diffusion. Follow up examination after 6 months, revealed persistent focal neurological deficits in 3 patients. Follow-up cerebral MRI at 6 months showed a resolution of the hyperintense lesions, but developing focal atrophic changes in all patients. CONCLUSION: SESA syndrome should be included among the alcohol-related encephalopathies as a particular pathophysiological entity. The possibility of permanent brain damage should encourage a better clinical awareness of this syndrome to establish prompt diagnosis, relevant investigation and appropriate treatment of recurrent seizures including, if necessary, intensive care unit treatment.

Are the clinical classifications for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures reliable?

BACKGROUND: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) are episodes that resemble epileptic seizures but are of psychological origin. A few studies have attempted to describe different types of PNES as a combination of clinical signs but their validation and robustness have not yet been reached. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of five existing clinical PNES classifications. METHODS: A total of 107 PNESs from 54 patients were retrospectively analyzed independently by two trained epileptologists, who were blinded to each other's findings. The recorded events were grouped according to the five chosen classifications systems. The IRR was measured using a kappa (κ) coefficient for each PNES classification. We also report category-specific κ values. RESULTS: Our study demonstrated a mild to moderate IRR (κ from 0.44-0.68) for classifying PNES using the 5 proposed classification schemes. Within these classifications, the most reproducible classes are the subjective ones followed by the dialeptic group. Classes based on motor signs are the least reproducible. CONCLUSION: The IRR for current clinical classifications of PNES was only moderate. The difficulty to analyze motor signs could explain this poor reliability. It is necessary to ensure the reliability of clinical classifications of PNES in order for them to be a relevant tool in clinical practice or to explore correlations in clinical research. Future research would benefit from increased precision of diagnostic criteria specific to each class.